The raging controversy over the blasphemous cartoons printed in the Danish press is still going strong with no sign of let-down in protests and demonstrations in Islamic countries.

While many in the West have rightly condemned the cartoons, they understandably might not appreciate the intensity of the sentiments of the Muslims and may feel the reaction is not in proportion with the provocation. I'd like to make mention of a few points which may help bridge this gulf of misunderstanding.

First of all, Christianity, unlike Islam, is essentially an iconographic religion. Visual representations of Jesus, Mother Mary and the parts of the Trinity are widespread and prevalent everywhere in the Christian world.

Islam and Judaism take the polar opposite view. They are religions of the word and not of the image. Consequently, illustrations of religious personages are greatly discouraged and are considered taboo; even if they were highly favorable representations drawn up by Muslims themselves.

The cartoons in European newspapers depicting among other things, the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) with a missile-shaped turban could not have been more provocative and hurtful for Muslims. Even Christians, with all their iconography, would very rightly be greatly offended if someone were to similarly depict Jesus in the act of throwing down cluster bombs. For Muslims, with their strong views on visual representations, the offense is even greater.

A few have even gone as far as to support the newspapers under the guise of upholding the freedom of speech. But the freedom of expression is not absolute and entails great responsibility and a need for conscientiousness.

Also, I wonder where these self-righteous bastions of the 'Freedom of Speech' were when Britain's Prince Harry wore a Nazi Uniform with a Swastika armband to a costume party a little over a year ago. As many will remember, the Prince was severely ostracized and his actions widely condemned. Why were they silent then? Why the double-standards?

Having said all that, I'd like to affirm that the greatly publicized actions of some Muslims who have unfortunately resorted to flag-burning, embassy-stoning and other violent means of protest are indeed unjustified and wrong. These Muslims would do well to recall the example of their Prophet's patience and fortitude when he was persecuted and provoked in Mecca during the earlier part of his Mission. They are in no way exemplifying his patience in adversity.

However, I should mention that Islam is the religion of a quarter of the world's population, and the media unfortunately focuses on the acts of a very few. It is quite apparent the many peaceful demonstrations and non-violent acts such as the decision by some authorities to boycott Danish goods are obviously shoved in the distant background in the face of more 'newsworthy' reactions.

Lastly, kudos to the American media for, by and large, showing great foresight and judgment in not printing these hurtful cartoons out of respect for Islam.

Faizan Ahmad

Freshman

Philosophy